Now the course found its end and we should ask ourselves:
What is such a computer in reality?
is he an "electronic brain"?
or
has it an "electronic brain"?
I think, to both questions
we can answer
NO!
my own opinionon, to "artificial intelligence" I showed at another place. Now we have better reasons for it.
I add a short story:
It was in 1996; when Garri Kasparow lost his remarkable game of chesss against the IBM-Computer "Deep Blue", then -I think it was the BILD-Zeitung- produced the headline:
Zum ersten Mal hat der Mensch den Kampf gegen die Maschine verloren
(at first time man has lost his struggle against the machine.)
The Reality: A world champion of chess was overwhelmed by a group of chess fan programmers - each of them he would easily have put in his pockets. "The struggle against the machine" had lost already everybody who drove his vehicle against a tree - that is normally called "human failure" (on the last page of the newspaper). (Oh, my speech! - it was not the BILD-Zeitung which wrote that nonsense it swerde some redactors who did that...)
But - didn't I just survive my struggle against the computer? - The data "1996" and "Garri Kasparow" from whre did I get them? Not from my memory, but by Google I filled my gaps...
And how did the Google people fill their computers? By Internet data of other people (squatting at their computers...).
move on